Mathematics as Paideia in Proclus :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Mathematics as Paideia in ProclusABSTRACT I examine one aspect of the primal role which mathematics plays in Procluss ontology and epistemology, with particular reference to his Elements of Theology. I decoct on his peculiar views about the ontological status of mathematical objects and the supererogatory faculties of the soul that atomic number 18 involved in understanding them. If they are further if abstract objects that are stripped away from sensible things, then they are unlikely to reorient the mind towards the intelligible realm, as envisioned by Plato in the Republic. Thus, in order to defend the function of mathematics as a prodaideutic to dialectic, Proclus rejects Aristotelian abstractionism in favor of an elaborate calculate in terms of Nous projecting images of its Forms through the medium of the imagination. In metaphorical terms, he replaces the Aristotelian image of the soul as a blank tablet with that of a tablet that has everlastingly been inscribed and is always writing itself, while also being written on by Nous. The mediating function of mathematics for understanding the higher realities is grounded in the fact that its fundamental principles of Limit and Unlimited have a universal provenance in Procluss whole system of reality.IntroductionAlexander of Aphrodisias established abstractionism as an Aristotelian dogma about mathematical objects, but for later Neoplatonists this be difficult to reconcile with the educational function of mathematics in Platos philosophic curriculum. Thus Proclus, for example, rejected abstractionism as a basis for the procession to the realm of Forms, and proposed an alternative view based on the typical Neoplatonic hierarchy of Nous, Soul, and Nature. At the highest noetic level, geometric Forms are unextended and indivisible, so that only at the level of Soul can they become available for charter by the geometrician when they are corporeal in the intelligible social function supplied by the imagination. Proclus also accepted that geometrical tracks can be embodied in sensible matter, though they never have the exactitude needed for science, nor could they ever acquire it through abstraction. Thus the diagrams used by the geometer are products of the imagination, which are really projections by the higher intellect onto a lower level so as to facilitate the study of geometrical objects. Proclus seems to accept that the human intellect can never attain the Platonic goal of studying geometrical Forms in their pure and unextended form as paradigms. Although such a goal can be achieved only by divine Nous, yet it becomes for Proclus the guiding rationale for his whole system.