The Moral Issues of Freenet and Online File Sharing :: Internet Technology Computers Essays

The Moral Issues of warrantnet and Online File Sharing The internet today is a vast network that contains nearly limitless amount of moneys of information and media. With this immense amount of data at our fingertips, the line between rectify and wrong has begun to blur. The vile downloading of copyrighted material has exploded in recent years, but a larger issue looms over the currentcopyrighting frenzy. It is that of the preservation of free savoir-faire in cyberspace. Should the government be allowed to limit our access to unsuitable heart and soul? And to what degree? These ar not easy questions to answer, nor should they be. Similar questions have been increase throughout biography. Freenet is a program that has been developed to provide an answer to the same question with a definite no. The following rise leave behind explain what Freenet is and how it fits into the free speech debate and future of the internet. In this essay I leave alone discuss the following A quick history of free speech on the InternetAn explanation of FreenetHow Freenet functionsFreenets role in the future progression of the digital ageThe illegal usage of Freenet Free Speech and the InternetThe first amendment to the constitution reads Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Constitution) We as Americans have the right to speak our minds. We are able to criticize the government and voice our opinions in the form of voting and political debate. This is not only a right, it is bouncy for the survival of our country. The internet is no stranger to free speech debates. In early 1996 the Communications Decency Act was passed. This act prevented indecent and patently revolting content which included profanity and many works of classic publi cations that contained such material. No less than 6 months later, the CDA was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In 1997 the Supreme Court granted the Internet broad protection under the 1 amendment entitling it the same freedoms of print media. Two sides are now battling on a new front the abuse of 1 amendment in cyber space through the exchange of illegal material. I will discuss this issue in more detail later.