International Student Identity Essay

indistinguishability is sort of behaviour that send word be symbolismized by single or communities by bespeaking how they move to all(prenominal) other and how they represent their culture of origin. These essay forget discuss and try some theories of indentity through culture and languange views and then show the enterer how these genus Lens might influence international disciple individualism. The structure of essay allow be organised as follows First of all, introduction willing explicate an overview of it.This is followed by describing the theory of individualism. The next section is about password of identicalness by using culture and language focuses. Further more(prenominal), writer will condone the tinge of refreshing culture and language to international scholarly persons current and future experience. Finally, a conslusion paragraph will be the final exam section of the essay. What is Identity? In last three decades, the theory of indistinguishabilit y element element evolves continously.harmonize to Borowski (1976, 501), identity element does non throw a definite concept. some(prenominal) scholars explore what identity is. For example, in his paper, hit and Reitzes (1981) summarise the work of McCall and Simmons (1966), Stryker (1968), and Burke and Tully (1977) to divide the concept of identity in three unique characteristics that atomic number 18, identities ar produced by society, identities atomic number 18 somebodyal sense, and identities are spontaneous and representational character.This typical feature is obtained by an individual throughout childhood period to take his/her fundamental character (Sokefeld et. al. 1999, 2). Later on, Fearon (1999, 4) broadly explains that identity of a someone coffin nail be defined as social identity (a person is recognised by rules deciding membership and performed characteristic features or attributes) and in the flesh(predicate) category (special feature, might be perman ent, that view as a person is ascertained meaning(a) by society).Furthermore, Hall (1990, 222) argues that the theories of identity keep to be produced, which is never complete, forever and a day in process and always constituted within, not after-school(prenominal), representation In addition, on that point are still challenges to identity theory to have unadorned meanings that related to self and society (Stryker and Burke 2000, 284). Culture Identity According to archaeological term (SAA 2008), culture means a set of make outledgeable beliefs, values and behaviours the way of life shared by the members of a society. It is performed because there is relationship between each(prenominal) of members (Ferdman 1990, 186).They usually gather in a group of society. For example, if some Javanese community (one of Indonesian ethnics) live outside of Indonesia, they tend to live in a place where other Javanese live. They interact with each other and applying Javaneses values t hat they have before. These dispositions maintain and develop their values and applying it in their daily living. Other citizenry who are not a member of that society might look this mind-set as culture identity of that society. In addition, Hall (1990, 229) argues that heathenish identities are the special character that emerge from history and culture.For instance, culture identities of England and Ireland are quite resembling, because they have similar history and culture. Cultural identity represents individual or groups behaviour. According to Kochman (1987, 220 cited in Ferdman 1990, 190), cultural identity can be represented by ethnic and indirect merge between an individual and the group. It has main value that the beliefs and act becomes a symbol of the group, and the member realise that he/she has direct relationship with the most Copernican and unique part of their culture (Smolic 1981, 75-77 cited in Ferdman 1990, 190) .This value is simple, however its malleability , imprecision, and multivocality, make cultural identity become complicated (Cohen 1993, 202). Furthermore, it can be influenced by anything because of cultural identity is unstable (Hall 1990, 229). Language Identity Language is primarily employ when people interact to each other. Yihong et. al. (2005, 39) state that language is not just to fall out, but It associated with culture which create ones self-identity. Moreover, it represents the identity of a society (Miller 2000, 69).For example, International students from Indonesia, Middle East countries, or China, will enunciate by using their native language when they interact to student from same country. Indonesian language, Arabic language, Mandarin or Cantonese languages are their identity. heap might k nowadays who they are by listening to their conversation. Language and identity can not be separated. Scholars argue that language use and identity is inherent with social practices and membership (Miller 2000, 69). He also affirms that self-representation is a harvest of language use and identity (Miller 2000, 69).How person speaks, what type of vocabularies, represent the identity of the speaker. For instance, a truck driver will not use same language as a Professor use, and a postgraduate student has different style of language that high school student does. tied(p) though they have same mother tongue, such as side, they speak differently because they come from different society. Their identity shows what and how they differ. International Student Identity People who pursue their study to overseas university will have current identity as international student.They become member of student society. During study, each individual enacts its duty as student (Fearon 1999, 19). A student can be seen by another member of society as college student, or the other way around. Furthermore, he or she may make a self-identity embedded with academic consequences (Reitzes and Burke 1982 cited in Reitzes and Burke 1991, 243). By representing their recent identity, they should study hard, submit the assignment on time, do some examinations, interact to other students and lecturer, and so on.Being international student in Australia, a person who comes from country which has different culture and language use will do some adjustments related with culture and language. He or she should modify with Australian or western culture, and using English language more frequent. These adjustments may be done to make his or her study undefeated and to make their live during here easy. For instance, using English language to communicate to another student from different country and lecturer or educate is a must(prenominal) otherwise he or she can not interact.Another illustration is when he or she has group assignment which requires works with Australian student or western countries student. Possibly, Australian people is genuinely common with assertive behaviour (Putnis and Petelin 2007, 3. 3), which can annoy him or her. rather of the study group is unsuccessful, acceptation to this behaviour should be considered, since it has positive impact to the group. Postgraduate student identity It is very interesting for me to deal with stark naked culture. I have to make a lot of adjustments while I am here. For example, I should say thank you to the bus driver to show my politeness and appreciation.It might be sort of Australian culture which is extraordinary(predicate) attitude in my country. Another case is about calling a lecturer or someone who has higher position than me just by mentioning his or her first name. For the first time, it is so unfamiliar for me, because in Indonesia, I have to call them by saying Mr or Mrs before their name. In spite of the example above, I am very surprised to know that drinking inebriant and get drunk is frequently done by most of Australian people. They always do this thing every workweek end. Using English as new-fashioned constraint language in the university is a remarkable thing for me.All things that related with my study are in English. At the beginning, it is quite difficult for me to be used to English language, because English is not my first or second language. However, I must try hard to improve my English, by speaking and interacting more very much with other native or international student. After all, now I feel my self-representation changes. According to (Yihong et. al. 2005, 39-40), I am in the level of self confidence change and additive change. As a postgraduate student, to establish reading habit and critical thinking are also new culture for me.To do my assignment well, all problems should be keen evaluated and analytically critiqued (Atkinson and Longman 2003 cited in Davies and Maldoni). They also suggest that critical thinking can be established by doing a lot of reading. For example, I need to read a lot of references to support my opinion in a discussion essay. Impact to my future Ther e are many Australian cultures which can influence my self identity. However, I have to sort whether it will be positive or negatif impact for me. For the negatif one, such as drinking alcohol habit, I will not allow my self to be influenced by that thing.On the other hand, assertive behaviour and the way how Australian people appreciate someone else will give the positive impact for me. In the future, my self will be more assertive and will appreciate people more. Another good impact for me is high level of English proficiency. Practising english everyday will make non-native speaker highly reassured (Yihong et. al. 2005, 39-40). Conclusion The concept of identity still changes and many experts try to devise the suitable definition of identity. New culture and language use which set about by international student will affect to their self identity.These new lenses might have positive or negative impact to them. They will have high self-confidence in interacting to another peopl e. However, they should make a choice to absorb whether native culture is acceptable to be used as their self-representation or not. Reference Borowski, E. J. 1976. Identity and Personal Identity. Mind. 85 (340) 481-502. http//links. jstor. org/sici? sici=00264423%28197610%292%3A85%3A340%3C481%3AIAPI%3E2. 0. CO%3B2-L (accessed at 24 butt against 2008). Burke, P. J. and D. C. Reitzes. 1981. The link between identity and usage performance Social Psychology Quarterly.44 (2) 83-92. http//links. jstor. org/sici? sici=01902725%28198106%2944%3A2%3C83%3ATLBIAR%3E2. 0. CO%3B2 (accessed at 20 process 2008). Cohen, A. P. 1993. Culture as identity An anthropologists view. New literary History. 24 (1) 195-209. http//links. jstor. org/sici? sici=00286087%28199324%2924%3A1%3C195%3ACAIAAV%3E2. 0. CO%3B2-R (accessed at 27 March 2008). Davies, A. and A. Maldoni. Meeting the ineluctably of International Postgraduate Students Modifying the EAP Curriculum for Masters Preparation Programs. http//ww w. englishaustralia. com. au/index. cgi?E=hcatfuncs&PT=sl&X=getdoc&Lev1=pub_c05_07&Lev2=c04_davie. (accessed at 27 March 2008). Fearon, J. D. 1999. What is identity (as we now use the word). Department of Political Science. Stanford University. http//www. stanford. edu/jfearon/papers/iden1v2. pdf (accessed at 24 March 2008). Ferdman, B. M. 1990. Literacy and Cultural Identity. Harvard Educational Review. 60 (2) 181. Academic Research Library.http//eric. ed. gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini. jsp ?_nfpb= unfeigned&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ408106&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ408106.(accessed at 27 March 2008). Hall, S. 1990. Culture Identity and Diaspora. http//www. lwbooks. co. uk/ReadingRoom/reality/IdentityDiaspora. pdf. (accessed at 27 March 2008). Kagan, H. and Cohen, J. 1990. Cultural adjustment of international students. psychological Science. 1 (2) 133-137. http//www. blackwell-synergy. com. ezp02. library. qut. edu. au/doi/abs/10. 1111 /j. 1467-9280. 1990. tb00082. x (accessed at 27 March 2008). Miller, J. M. 2000. Language use, identity, and social interaction migrant students in Australia. Research on Language & Social Interaction.33(1) 69-100. http//dx. doi. org/10. 1207/S15327973RLSI3301_3. (accessed 7 March 2008). Putnis P. and R. Petelin. 2007. Improving personal communication. In QCD210/220/211 book of readings. Brisbane Queensland University of Technology. Stryker, S. and Burke, P. J. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly. 63 (4) 284-297. http//links. jstor. org/sici? sici=0190-2725%28200012%2963%3A4%3C284%3ATPPAFO%3E2. 0. CO%3B2-G. (accessed at 24 March 2008). Society for American Archaeology. 1996. http//www. saa.org/publications/sampler/terms. hypertext markup language (accessed at 27 March 2008). Sokefeld, M. , Chaudhary, M. A. , Driessen, H. , Ewing, K. P. , Fuchs. , Gellner, D. N. , Haley, B. D. , et al. 1999. Debating self, identity, and culture in a nthropology (and comments and reply). Current Anthropology. 40 (4) 417-447. http//links. jstor. org/sici? sici=00113204%28199908%2F10%2940%3A4%3C417%3ADSIACI%3E2. 0. CO%3B2-5 (accessed at 27 March 2008) Yihong, G. , Ying, C. , Yuan, Z. , and Yan Z. 2005. Self-identity changes and English learning among Chinese undergraduates. World Englishes. 24 (1)